This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was redirect.
Comment: Someone has already been bold and created the redirect. Further discussions of which article should redirect to where should be done on the respective Talk pages. Rossami(talk) 20:06, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page has become a basically out of date version of the Las Vegas, Nevada page. It has almost no contributions since it was created. It is not linked from other vegas pages. The discusions on the Las Vegas page have not indicated support for keeping this page. It is similar in name to the Las Vegas metropolitan area page which is linked to and seems better suited to being kept and renamed after additional discussion on the Las Vegas page.Vegaswikian 00:58, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Actually all of the material already exists on other pages and there is no need for merging any data.Vegaswikian 01:53, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
just redirect it then. DaveTheRed 04:19, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The only real page that links here is a user page. I don't see a reason to use a redirect.Vegaswikian 06:46, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Redirect. There were a couple things in this article that should be salvaged. I put one of the photos in the main Las Vegas, Nevada article and one in Las Vegas Monorail, and some of the facts about the monorail into the main article. A redirect isn't all that important but it might as well be done, if only to lessen the chance that someone else will create an article at this title. JamesMLane 21:29, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.